Gleed’s Blog: When Real Is Too Real

IF YOU STARTED PWBOOM PODCAST AUDIO, CLICK SPEAKER ICON (on the right half of the purple podcast box above) TO MUTE BEFORE LEAVING BROWSER WINDOW

By Haydn Gleed, Prowrestling.net Staffer (@haydngleed)

It’s my personal belief that bringing real life elements into a storyline can enhance the character of a performer. We’ve all heard over the years that Steve Austin got over like he did because he was essentially playing himself turned up to eleven. And there are countless additional examples of moments that the fans feel totally immersed in the story of a character because the performer can totally engage with the storyline basing their inspiration on real life emotions. I’ve always found myself enjoying and immersing myself in a storyline that I feel is real, even if it’s just within the confines of a wrestling universe. It’s the same with any scripted TV show, if you feel the character is real within the confines of that universe then you engage more with that particular show.

In more recent years, the general feeling has been because the fans are now in on the secret of pro wrestling being pre-determined, it’s an effective storyline tool to bring real life elements into storyline feuds. People would argue that as long as all parties involved are comfortable with real life issues to be exploited then it’s fine, and I would agree. Look at how effective the Nikki Bella and Ronda Rousey feud was based on real life relationships being brought into the mix. I’m also perfectly fine with Nia Jax and WWE playing up the situation with Becky Lynch as long as Becky has given her full blessing. Ultimately that’s all that matters, if Nia genuinely apologized to Becky, and if Lynch gave her bless for her injury to exploited, as they are the only parties involved. I get the argument that WWE needs to resolve the issue of Nia injuring people, but that’s another subject for another day. Besides, I’m sure WWE dealt with the situation in whatever way they felt was appropriate based on the accounts of the wrestlers involved.

All of that said, WWE went too far in their attempt to make something feel real on Monday Night Raw this week. Dean Ambrose’s comments on how Roman Reigns is essentially being punished by the man upstairs, a reference to Reigns’s real life battle with leukemia. I appreciate that a heel has to say and do things which incite the crowd and get a negative reaction. But when you start using a legitimate illness Reigns has, one that millions of people around the world are also battling in some form, and it’s all to further a storyline, then it’s not just in poor taste, it’s sick.

The counter argument as I’ve already stated is that as long as Roman’s comfortable with this then what’s the big deal? Well, in this circumstance it’s not just an issue that Roman is dealing with, but it’s concerning a disease that children and adults watching at home may also be battling, in which case you have to be sensitive to the topic and I would argue you should just simply stay away from it. To say on international television that this is God’s punishment for something Roman’s character did is just plain wrong. How many kids are battling this terrible disease and are now asking their parents “why is God punishing me? What did I do wrong?” Heck, some of these kids may have had a Make A Wish granted by WWE in the past. Think about that for a minute. Roman may or may not have signed off on his illness being exploited for storyline fodder, but the usage was just plain wrong.

By the way, what kind of person would actually ask someone battling leukemia if it’s okay to exploit their illness?

As always, feel free to reach out to me on twitter @haydngleed or via email haydn.gleed@gmail.com

Check below for Monday’s ProWrestling.net Live with Jason Powell and Will Pruett taking calls and email questions coming out of WWE Survivor Series and NXT Takeover: WarGames.


WE VALUE YOUR PRIVACY

Readers Comments (10)

  1. Meh…didn’t find it offensive at all. Just showed lack of creativity.

    • Each to their own mate. Totally respect your opinion 🙂 Having just lost someone close to me to cancer I don’t particularly find it comfortable with what was being indicated.

  2. “To say on international television that this is God’s punishment for something Roman’s character did is just plain wrong. How many kids are battling this terrible disease and are now asking their parents “why is God punishing me? What did I do wrong?”

    Well said. I know it’s a different illness, but I wonder what little Connor the Crusher’s parents thought while watching that.

  3. I’ll have something to say when I finish yawning at this self-righteous tripe. If the workers are okay with it, then you have literally zero right to say it’s inappropriate to use it in a storyline.

    • That’s literally not the point I was making. I said if it’s only something that affects the wrestlers I.e. the issue with Jax and Lynch then I have no issue with it, if it’s something whereby you’re outright saying “you have cancer because you’ve upset god” then that doesn’t affect just the performers, it affects the viewers at home who may have to answer the question from loved ones and kids who have it planted in their head that they are ill cause they have done something to upset god.

      • No, it really doesn’t. It affects Roman and his family only. If they’re okay with it then nobody else has any grounds for saying it’s wrong. Period.

        • I genuinely don’t know if you are being serious or if you are a troll. With the greatest respect to Roman, he’s not the only
          one who currently has cancer so yes it does affect other people if the insinuation is cancer is a punishment from god.

          • “I genuinely don’t know if you are being serious or if you are a troll.”

            Check out his other posts some time Haydn, the answer is definitely the latter. Don’t waste your time.

  4. They touch on real life happenings all the time. Were they not supposed to do a memorial to Roman’s brother when he passed because it’d remind people, some of them children, of their own brothers’ deaths? Should they not reference Dean and Renee being married because it will make people think of a bitter divorce they’ve gone through? There may have been children watching and wishing their recently divorced parents would get back together. They acknowledge injuries, deaths, unwelcome retirements like DB and Paige, those are all real things that real people deal with. It only makes sense that bad guys have negative perspectives and good guys are positive and sympathetic when tragedy happens. Even children are sensible enough to understand, you don’t behave like the bad guy, you’re supposed to emulate the good actions of the good guys.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.